<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are The Pats REALLY That Good? (Part 2)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://with-malice.com/2007/12/18/are-the-pats-really-that-good-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://with-malice.com/2007/12/18/are-the-pats-really-that-good-part-2/</link>
	<description>The NBA, and the mad ramblings of a sports-mad guy living in Japan...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 19:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: He&#8217;ll Be Watching&#8230; &#171; With Malice&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://with-malice.com/2007/12/18/are-the-pats-really-that-good-part-2/#comment-7727</link>
		<dc:creator>He&#8217;ll Be Watching&#8230; &#171; With Malice&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 03:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://with-malice.com/2007/12/18/are-the-pats-really-that-good-part-2/#comment-7727</guid>
		<description>[...] Be&#160;Watching&#8230;  1 01 2008   One of the guys (Matt) who participated in the Are The Pats REALLY That Good? discussion wrote the following [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Be&nbsp;Watching&#8230;  1 01 2008   One of the guys (Matt) who participated in the Are The Pats REALLY That Good? discussion wrote the following [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://with-malice.com/2007/12/18/are-the-pats-really-that-good-part-2/#comment-7056</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 02:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://with-malice.com/2007/12/18/are-the-pats-really-that-good-part-2/#comment-7056</guid>
		<description>Don't discount the Chargers either. They are in some decent form, and will have learnt from last year... hopefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t discount the Chargers either. They are in some decent form, and will have learnt from last year&#8230; hopefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kip</title>
		<link>http://with-malice.com/2007/12/18/are-the-pats-really-that-good-part-2/#comment-7047</link>
		<dc:creator>kip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://with-malice.com/2007/12/18/are-the-pats-really-that-good-part-2/#comment-7047</guid>
		<description>My tip has been Dallas all along

New England, Green Bay and Indianpolis are dangerous

kip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My tip has been Dallas all along</p>
<p>New England, Green Bay and Indianpolis are dangerous</p>
<p>kip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Becker</title>
		<link>http://with-malice.com/2007/12/18/are-the-pats-really-that-good-part-2/#comment-6973</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 09:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://with-malice.com/2007/12/18/are-the-pats-really-that-good-part-2/#comment-6973</guid>
		<description>The Fuzz is in town ;~)   The Pats are that good, but even if they do go unbeaten, I wouldn't put em as the best ever*, as that's hard enough to argue as it is. This is the only time they've played dominant when compared to their past 3 Super Bowl teams. But I also think it's no coincidence that the record they will end up breaking (for pts scored), was Randy Moss's Viking team back in '98.


* I would pit the freakin Dallas teams from the 90's better than the Pats - that offensive line just mowed teams down by the 4th qtr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Fuzz is in town ;~)   The Pats are that good, but even if they do go unbeaten, I wouldn&#8217;t put em as the best ever*, as that&#8217;s hard enough to argue as it is. This is the only time they&#8217;ve played dominant when compared to their past 3 Super Bowl teams. But I also think it&#8217;s no coincidence that the record they will end up breaking (for pts scored), was Randy Moss&#8217;s Viking team back in &#8216;98.</p>
<p>* I would pit the freakin Dallas teams from the 90&#8217;s better than the Pats - that offensive line just mowed teams down by the 4th qtr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
